Obama ’supports repeal’ of same-sex marriage ban, Lawyers say

The Obama administration sent mixed signals on same sex-marriage Monday, frustrating both sides of the contentious issue.

In a legal brief filed Monday, Justice Department lawyers asserted that the administration “does not support” a law that limits the federal definition of marriage to heterosexual couples, calling it “discriminatory” and saying that the administration “supports its repeal.”

Yet in that same brief, Justice Department lawyers ask a judge to throw out a lawsuit against the that very same law, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

It is a sign that the Obama administration is feeling pressure from gay-rights groups, who say President Obama has not done enough for their cause since his inauguration. For its part, the administration appears to feel caught between its duty to defend a law that it sees as legitimate and a desire to overturn it.

In Monday’s brief, lawyers said that Congress acted reasonably when it passed the law, which not only defines marriage as being between a man and a women but also gives states the right to refuse to recognize gay marriages performed elsewhere.

“We appreciate that this brief represents progress, but it falls short of where it needs to be,” says Jennifer Pizer, senior counsel and Marriage Project Director for Lambda Legal, a gay and lesbian rights group.

Ms. Pizer and other gay rights advocates would like to see the administration back away from any defense of DOMA.

Mr. Obama said he would like to see DOMA overturned by Congress.

But he said in a statement Monday that the administration is obliged to defend lawsuits that challenge federal law.

Jurisprudence does not suggest that that is necessarily so, according to Lambda Legal. It cites eight cases since 1983 in which courts upheld an administration’s right to not defend laws passed during previous administrations.

“This list is not to suggest that the administration is completely outside of mainstream thought in deciding to defend DOMA, but just to show that [the Department of Justice] certainly does not have an absolute duty to defend,” Ms. Pizer writes in an e-mail

In Monday’s brief, the government contended that the plaintiffs in this case, a gay couple from California, have not shown that other states did not recognize their marriage or that they have been denied federal benefits.

The administration’s approach to the case has angered many in the gay-rights community. In an earlier brief – in June – Justice Department lawyers asserted that DOMA did not amount to discrimination against gay couples.

One advocate of DOMA sees the new statement within Monday’s brief as a placatory gesture with little legal significance. “The only thing that I see that has changed since June is that they are responding to the outcry that erupted from the advocates of same-sex marriage,” says Peter Sprigg, senior fellow for policy studies at the Family Research Council.

But that in itself is a disturbing development for organizations that oppose same-sex marriage. “It’s inconsistent with his stated beliefs that marriage should be a union between a man and a woman,” says Mr. Sprigg.

Lambda Legal’s Pizer says she thinks Monday’s brief has an importance beyond the political. Opponents of same-sex marriage, which is now legal in six states, have long charged that such unions are harmful to children. In Monday’s papers, the government made a firm stance against such claims.

Government lawyers said that the US “does not believe that DOMA is rationally related to any legitimate government interests in procreation and child-rearing” and supported scientific evidence “that children raised by gay and lesbian parents are as likely to be well-adjusted as children raised by heterosexual parents.”

Pizer says that she expects a bill to overturn DOMA to be introduced when Congress returns from summer recess. “There is just a different level of awareness today than 13 years ago when [DOMA] was enacted.”

Moreover, she says that two other cases against DOMA are pending. Those, says Pizer, clearly state the harm faced by same-sex couple who are denied federal benefits because of their marriage status

Klik disini untuk melanjutkan »»

Meet the girl whose 'rear view' Captivated Obama at G-8

The girl who appeared to have caught the eye of US President Barack Obama and that of his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy at the G-8 summit in Italy has been identified as a 17-year-old social activist.

Mayora Tavares shot to fame overnight after a photograph depicting Obama seemingly looking at her bottom while Sarkozy also appeared to be taking in the view was published on news websites across the globe.

The Brazilian woman, a Rio de Janeiro resident, was reportedly selected to participate in the Junior G8 summit after working on a human rights study in two notorious Rio towns, reports the Sydney Morning Herald.

In an interview with Brazilian television this month, she dubbed travelling to the G8 as an "inexplicable feeling".

The photograph evoked many smirks and comments around the world.

Klik disini untuk melanjutkan »»

Was Obama really Checking out a woman’s rear in G-8?

Would Sarkozy look on amused when Obama checks out a woman's rear? The picture looks like it, anyway! A reporter behind the controversial G-8 photo, which depicts US President Barack Obama seemingly checking out a woman’s rear, has now lent some clarity to it.

"There has been interest in a certain photo of the president during this photo-op, and I have mentioned what I saw from my perspective to several of you, so here it is for everyone,” the Politico quoted Pool reporter Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times as saying in an addendum sent to White House reporters.

Obama was the centre of attention for most of the event. All eyes were on him, particularly, when the group entered, and as the juniors—the teen student that accompanied each leader—were leaving the stage.

Dinan says that he did not look anything from his perspective that looked like Obama checking out anyone.

He says that he did see Obama act as a traffic cop, and keep things running.

“Obama greeted most, if not all, of the juniors,” the reporter said.

“For the photo Obama was standing in between Sarkozy (on his left) and the US junior, with Lula's junior and then Lula to right of them. The juniors were led out by summit staff one-by-one to the right of the stage, while the leaders remained for their own photo. It was at this point that your pooler did see Obama, Lula and Sarkozy laughing and appearing to needle each other over something as they were looking toward their right,” the reporter added.

Klik disini untuk melanjutkan »»